No moral problem proved insurmountable. In an almost comically circular argument, Goldhagen concludes that the Germans’ Ahab-like loathing of the Jews originated in their loathing of the Jews: It is less hysterical than this work, but it is also grossly flawed. The answer cannot be the uniqueness of German anti-Semitism. It was the Nazis’ unprecedentedly “extreme and thoroughgoing
Finkelstein meticulously documents Goldhagen’s distortions of secondary literature and the internal contradictions of his argument. Goldhagen’s recklessness seems to have inspired another work with a similar intent, “Ordinary Men”, by Christopher Browning, It, too, is an attempt to tar every single German man, woman and child with the brush of racism and mass murder. Indeed, Germans today are “democrats, committed democrats. Your request to send this item has been completed. Create lists, bibliographies and reviews: Bolstered as it is by a bulging scholarly apparatus, the audacious sweep of Goldhagen’s thesis nonetheless merits emphasis.
By pointing out his slapdash research, his cherry-picking of quotes, his misrepresentation of source material, his outright making things up, his seeming ignorance of basic scholarship and the obvious contradictions he writes about but fails to notice, Finkelstein and Birn have done a valuable job. Leaving to one side the question of its veracity, this last formulation of Goldhagen’s is still problematic.
A Nation on Trial: The Goldhagen Thesis and Historical Truth
Refresh and try again. After all, German culture was “radically different” from ours. Mike rated it it was amazing Jan 11, A magisterial example of historiographical criticism. Goldhagen, Daniel Jonah — Hitler’s willing executioners. Finkelstein tfuth documents Goldhagen’s distortions of secondary literature and the internal contradictions of his argument.
A Nation on Trial – Wikipedia
Holt Paperbacks; 1st edition March 15, Language: For his views and suspected yoldhagen to anti-Zionist groups, Israel has denied Finkelstein entry and banned him from the country for a decade.
Dec 27, Sarah rated it really liked it Shelves: Thus, he suggests that more than percent of the German people would have relished the occasion to torture and murder Jews.
Joan rated it liked it Oct 17, To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up. In a seminal study published thirty-five years ago, The Destruction of the European Jews, Raul Hilberg observed that the perpetrators of the Nazi holocaust were “not different in their moral thesiw from the rest of the population Goldhagen depicts anti-Semitism as the manifestation of a deranged state.
A Nation on Trial: the Goldhagen Thesis and Historical Truth : Norman Finkelstein :
Preview this item Preview this item. Yet the question still remains, Whence the hatred of Jews? Merk rated it it was amazing Jul 10, War criminals — Psychology. Anti-Semitism, he suggests, was symptomatic of a much deeper German malaise.
Harvard gave Goldhagen a Ph. Yet, one is hard-pressed to name an account of the Nazi genocide that doesn’t situate it within the context of German anti-Semitism. Open Preview See a Problem?
Follow the Author
Germans bear no individual or, for that matter, collective guilt. Please enter the message.
It was the Nazis’ unprecedentedly “extreme and thoroughgoing Goldhagen takes to task the “conventional explanations” that supposedly ignore the “identity of the victims”: Against Our Better Judgment: My library Help Advanced Book Search. In making this categorization, he essentially labels Goldhagen’s work an act of propaganda, “touted as the ultimate testament to the Nazi Holocaust Yet, he explains neither why these normally quiescent passions burst forth in Germany nor why they were directed against the Jews.
An immediate national best-seller, the tye went on to create an international sensation. With compelling cumulative effect, Norman G. For his views and suspected connections to anti-Zionist groups, Israel has denied Finkelstein entry Norman Finkelstein, son of a holocaust survivor, is a fierce and controversial critic of Israeli policy, especially toward Palestinians.