EUTHANASIA CASE STUDY OF ARUNA

Thirty six years had lapsed since the said incident. Virani pleaded with the court that passive euthanasia be allowed for Shanbaug. It is also to be noted that the court accepted this petition under article 32 of the Indian Constitution. In the case of Gian Kaur v. Archived from the original on 10 January

This case is a landmark case as it prescribed the procedure to be followed in an area that has not been legislated upon. Archived from the original on 10 March Retrieved 25 October They were hearing the case Aruna Ramchandra Shanbaug v. Facebook Twitter Youtube Subscribe. Choose your reason below and click on the Report button.

The above procedure should be followed all over India until Parliament makes legislation on this subject. Your email address will not be published. Also, in the case of Mckay v. Human rights abuses in Kashmir Violence against women during the partition of India.

The court also observed the difference between euthanasia and physician assisted dying, the difference being in who administers the lethal medication.

Aruna Shanbaug – The Woman who triggered the debate on Euthanasia in India

When an application for passive euthanasia is arnua the Chief Justice of the High Court should forthwith constitute a Bench of at least two Judges who should decide to grant approval or not. It is also to be noted that the court accepted this petition under article 32 of the Indian Constitution.

Looking for Legal Help? In the case of State of Maharashtra v. To immobilize her during this act he twisted the chain around her neck. Prior to that night, Sohanlal, then a hospital janitor, had had a difficult relationship with Shanbaug, his superior. Views Sgudy Edit View history. BBC NewsDelhi.

  EDEXCEL GCE BIOLOGY COURSEWORK MARK SCHEME

euthanasia case study of aruna

The asphyxiation cut off oxygen to her brain, resulting in brain stem contusion injury, cervical cord injury, and cortical blindness. After hearing all the parties, the High Court bench should give its verdict. Laws relating to euthanasia in different jurisdictions were considered.

The court rejected the petition on 7 March The Supreme Court dealt with the aspect of informed consent and right to the bodily integrity of the patient as followed by the US after the Nancy Cruzan case [viii]. He asphyxiated her with a dog chain, and the lack of oxygen damaged her brain stem.

euthanasia case study of aruna

Eutjanasia the other hand, with more and more emphasis being laid on the informed consent of the patients in the medical field, the concept of Euthanasia in India has received a mixed response. In Novembershe was assaulted by ward boy, Sohanlal Bhartha Valmiki, of the same hospital while changing her clothes in the hospital basement. Those four conditions are The counsel for Ms.

How Aruna Shanbaug changed the euthanasia debate in India

Inwhile working as a junior nurse at King Edward Memorial HospitalParelMumbaiShanbaug was sexually assaulted by a ward boy, Sohanlal Bhartha Walmiki, and remained in a vegetative state following the assault. It was alleged that due to strangulation by the dog chain the supply of oxygen to the brain stopped and the brain got damaged.

  EBS DBA THESIS

Director, Missouri Department of Health, S. Euthanasia or mercy killing is of two types: Retrieved 24 May Will be displayed Will not be displayed Will be displayed. However, in the instant case, Aruna could breathe by herself and did not need any external assistance to breath and thus, distinguished from the Mckay case. How a living will can be made and executed in India. The Indian law in no way advocated not giving food to a person.

In the case of P. Further, the nursing staff at KEM Hospital was more than willing to take care of her.

euthanasia case study of aruna

Cass of euthanasia to Aruna would mean reversing the efforts taken by the nurses of KEM Hospital over the years. Shortly after Shanbaug’s death was announced, however, Sohanlal was traced to his father-in-law’s village of Parpa in western Uttar Pradeshwhere he was found to be still living, married with a family, and working as a labourer and cleaner in a power station.

State of Punjab[iii] the validity of Section of the IPC was in question, which penalised the abetment of suicide.